Thursday, August 31, 2006

Chronicle Reports on South Sienna Fire Station (MCFS#5)--CLICK title link for the entire story...


. . . .Staffing and equipment (click title link above for entire Chron. story)

Although not a resident of Sienna Plantation, Greyling Poats, who lives in Oakwick Forest, an older neighborhood on Trammel-Fresno Road about a half mile from Sienna Parkway, expressed concerns about staffing and equipment for the planned fire station and other existing fire stations.
"What's the use building fire stations when they are not adequately manned and equipped," said Poats, who lost in the recent mayoral race against Missouri City Mayor Allen Owen.

During a recent City Council meeting, Poats, an insurance agent, claimed that home insurance is higher in the ZIP code 77459, where his and the Sienna Plantation subdivisions are, than surrounding areas because of what he described as the area's unfavorable risk rating, known as the ISO rating that takes into account the area's fire protection capacity.

Simpson said Sienna Plantation has experienced relatively low demand for emergency responses.

A tally obtained from the fire department shows that between July 2005 and June this year, the subdivision generated an monthly average of 30 calls for service, totaling 370 calls.

That represents 8.5 percent of the total 4,352 calls during the 12-month period.

According to the fire department, the city has 51 firefighters in operations, with an average minimum 13 firefighters across the city per shift with a shift commander and an average minimum three firefighters per shift at each of four stations.

Simpson said balancing overall city needs with available resources is a key consideration in determining a fire station's staffing and equipment.

"Missouri City doesn't have four-men crews at this time like Houston, but we need a balance in meeting all city needs," he said. "If we could get additional men and trucks without taking away resources for other services, we'd be happy to do that.

"You can always use more police or fire protection while others may want more parks or lower taxes. City Council has to determine what it believes is a good balance to meet the overall needs of the city."

However, Simpson said a four-firefighter crew per shift is a municipal goal.

________________

Comment: I find this coverage well balanced from the Chronicle. I wonder why Mr. Muller didn't mention the monthly price to residents for this second Sienna area station, which was first listed at around 17.95 and later quoted at approximately $30.00? Why the price difference?

--Additional note-- Since Mo-City only rides 3 per truck, apparently in a major fire the first truck would have to wait for a second one to arrive before entering the building. Why was this not mentioned by city officials too?

--They also mention that it won't be completed for another 2-3 years. How many homes will we have then in this area? Why weren't the plans drawn up sooner?

--We'd like to thank Mr. White from a Sienna area neighborhood for his tireless work on the second area fire station and all the residents who became involved with this effort. We must remain vigilant based on the time lapse for delivery.

--Safety first guys!

15 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

3:13 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"The proposed apartment complex has absolutely no bearing whatsoever on the timing of the construction of Fire Station No. 5," Muller said."


--I can only suggest Mr. Muller revisit the Feb. '05 city council minutes and streaming video on this very issue and the promises made by council during those sessions for adequate police and fire protection.

3:15 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Simpson said it would take nine to 12 months to complete the design before construction begins and that the station could open in 2 1/2 to three years."


Interesting that last year the city was trying to work with our developer appointed MUD 1 board to push back the count for the trigger on the fire station but it looks like because planning was pushed back we won't see it for another 2-3 years.

3:17 AM  
Blogger responsible_dvlpmnt said...

From the earlier August thread on this issue:

Anonymous said...
Remember when this came out about our MCFS #4 . . . ;-)


MISSOURI CITY, Texas -- A Missouri City firefighter was fired and three others were disciplined after they played a game of strip poker while on duty at their fire station, News2Houston reported in an exclusive story Thursday.

Three male firefighters and one female paramedic participated in the game, which took place in January at Fire Station 4 in Sienna Plantation, officials said.

Missouri City's fire chief said he found out about the incident on a Friday and investigated all weekend.

"How could anybody be that stupid?" Fire Chief Mark Ewald said. "According to our investigation, it went down to where one person was covered only with a towel."

Ewald said the game was "totally unacceptable" and could have resulted in a dangerous situation.

"(If the alarm had sounded), it would have been a delayed response, because people would have had to get dressed before they could have responded," he said.

. . . from ch. 2 in Houston (Click2Houston.com)

3:40 AM


Anonymous said...
Update on thread:


...and this city manager letter promising no changes to the developers agreement after many residents contacted the city about a proposed delay (in the summer '05). Just a month after this SP master MUD 1 was proposing changes with the city and cc-ing JDC on these communications (I will post that MUD letter here later). This letter was run on SiennaNet.com and the now defunct resident site SiennaTalk.com. Interesting you can't find the "Simpson" letter in the SN archives anymore (glad we kept a copy):

____________________________

Recently there have been a number of inquiries regarding the Fire Station to be built in Sienna Plantation (most often referred to as Station 5). The inquiries have centered around when will Station 5 be built and whether or not the timing of its construction will deviate from what is stipulated in the Development Agreement (DA) between the City of Missouri City and the developers of Sienna Plantation (primarily to date, Johnson Development).

Simply put, neither the City of Missouri City nor Johnson Development will be seeking an amendment to the Development Agreement to delay the construction of Station 5. As per the existing terms of the DA, the developer has committed to build Station 5 within a year after there are 3000 homes in Sienna MUDâ?™s 2 and 3. The Cityâ?™s current records show there are 2454 homes constructed in MUDâ?™s 2 and 3, while the actual number to date is most likely approximately 2600.

Most of the recent inquiries have been after I responded to a citizenâ?™s request about Station 5. That e-mail dated April 11, 2005 has been widely circulated. In that response, I made the statement that staff would be requesting and recommending that the DA be amended to allow the delay of constructing Station 5. The reasoning behind the discussed delay was to avoid additional costs for residents while maintaining existing service levels; increased levels of service will cost more. This idea for Station 5â?™s delay was initiated by me and not Johnson Development. I also stated in the e-mail that the buildout of MUDâ?™s 2 and 3 would be approximately 3300 homes. That is not correct. Eventual total build out for Sienna MUDâ?™s 2 and 3 is approximately 4254. (Tract A in the Development Agreement consists of 3279 and Tract G in the DA consists of 975 lots. The 3300 homes in my e-mail reflected only Tract A, but MUDâ?™s 2 and 3 are comprised of both Tract A and Tract G. I based the idea of delaying Station 5â?™s construction because the 3000 home â?œtriggerâ?? for its construction was somewhat of an arbitrary number, and therefore 3300 was only a 10% increase.)

Other residential development in MUDâ?™s 4, 5, 6, and 7 will lag well behind the buildout of MUDâ?™s 2 and 3. However, with the projected buildout of MUDâ?™s 2 and 3 actually being 4254, and there being no real lag time in buildout, I will not be requesting the City Council and other parties to the DA consider approving a delay in the construction of Station 5.

To summarize:

1. Currently there are 3115 lots platted, 2600 homes constructed, and 4254 total lots projected for Sienna MUDâ?™s 2 and 3.

2. The existing Development Agreement (and Fire Protection Agreements for the residents of Sienna MUDâ?™s 2 and 3) between the City and the developer requires construction of Station 5 to be completed within a year after 3000 homes are constructed. There will not be a request from City staff or Johnson Development to change this.

3. The City, in accordance with the existing DA and Fire Protection Agreements, will operate Station 5 upon its completion, and the cost of the City operating Station 5 for the benefit of Sienna residents will be paid for by those Sienna residents. This total cost is estimated to be $600,000 annually. Based on that estimate and 3000 homes, the monthly fees for the Sienna residentsâ?™ fire service would be $16.67 versus the $7.45 that I believe the Sienna residents pay today. I want to stress those are only estimates and better data wonâ?™t be known until we better know when we will operate the station.

I hope this addresses the inquiries being made regarding the construction of Station 5. Please let me know if there is any other information you would like or if you have any questions on this matter.

Thank you,
Frank Simpson


____________________
Comment: Yep that's our city manager (Mo-city)...

3:45 AM


Anonymous said...
As promised from the MCC archives:

Orginally posted on Saturday, September 03, 2005

Attention: Sienna Plantation Developer Waste Treatment & FireStation Issues:

The following communication was included in the city council agenda items for the upcoming September 6th regular session under background for item 5c. Please note that this information is being made available before it has been posted to our resident's association website at SiennaNet.com or in the monthly newsletter (our dues pay for this). Comments on this in the following thread are welcome:

SIENNA PLANTATION MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1
c/o 3200 Southwest Freeway, Suite 2600
Houston, Texas 77027
August 12, 2005
The Honorable Allen Owen City of Missouri City
2022 Masters Lane Missouri City, TX 77459

Re: Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant to Serve Sienna Plantation South and Proposed City of Missouri City Fire Station No. 5

Dear Mayor Owen:

I am writing to you on behalf of the Board of Directors regarding two important projects in Sienna Plantation planned for construction in the next year. Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant The City of Missouri City (the "City") and Sienna Plantation Municipal Utility District No. 1 (the "District") entered into a Wastewater Treatment Services Contract dated April 5, 1999, which requires the City design, construct, finance and operate a regional wastewater treatment plant (the "Plant") to serve the land in what is commonly referred to Sienna South (Sienna Plantation MUDs 1-7). The start of this project has been delayed several times because of an incompatible site location and the bankruptcy of AFG Pacific Properties, Inc. After of the delays in the construction of the Plant (which the District acknowledges were completely outside the control of the City), the District expanded its interim facilities to serve recent development. However, based on the growth projections in Sienna South from Sienna/Johnson and Regent Properties, the District determined it is necessary to start the construction of the Plant as soon as possible. The Board of the District would like to request that the City allow the District, rather than the City, design, finance, construct and operate the Plant. The Board realizes that with the tremendous growth occurring in Missouri City due to the opening of the Fort Bend Parkway and the widening of State Highway 6, the City has limited

time and resources to devote to this project. On the other hand, the District is in a position to devote the appropriate amount of time and resources to ensure that the Plant is constructed in the timeframe that meets the District's requirements. The District would propose to construct an initial phase of 1.5 MGD and the necessary lift station and force main to divert the wastewater from the District's existing interim facilities. The District would also construct the treatment facilities necessary to treat the effluent to Type I standards for reuse as lake recharge and irrigation of the esplanades and common areas in Sienna Plantation. The City would be released of all obligations with respect to the Plant, until the annexation and dissolution of the District when ownership of the Plant would transfer to the City. The District estimates that the initial phase of the Plant would require a bond issue in the amount of $11.25 million. Obviously, under this proposal the City would not need to issue that debt and would free up its bonding capacity for other uses. Fire Station No. 5 The District and the City entered into a Fire Protection Agreement dated March 19, 2002, which provides for the District to construct and convey to the City a fire station comparable to Fire Station No. 4 and a fire truck. The City staff has expressed a desire to work with the District to "oversize" this Fire Station to provide for future expansion to meet the ultimate needs of the City. The Board of the District welcomes the opportunity to work with the City to meet the City's long-range needs in this area. However, the Sienna municipal utility districts received approval from the TCEQ and voted bonds in amount that only allows for the construction of a Fire Station comparable to No. 4. Thus, we have discussed with the City staff the possibility of entering into a cost-sharing agreement with the City to pay for the requested upgrades to the facility. The Board now recognizes that the City is in a better position to design the Fire Station and construct it in a manner that meets the City's needs. Therefore, the Board proposes that the District and the City enter into an agreement whereby the City would design (including site selection) and construct Fire Station No. 5. The District would pay to the City up to $2 million toward the cost of the fire station and a fire truck. The $2 million would be payable in four installments: i) upon site acquisitions; ii) within 45 days of the date the City selects an architect and reaches an agreement on that fee, iii) within 45 days of the date the City receives bids for the construction of thefire station; iv) within 45 days of the date the City approves a purchase contract for a fire truck. The developer in the District would have the right to approve the site selected and would retain architectural approval over the design of the fire station. The City would be authorized to construct a fire station of whatever size and at whatever cost it deems appropriate, however the District's financial obligation would be capped at $2 million. Thereafter, if the City has not yet annexed Sienna Municipal Utility District No. 2, the City and the District would enter into an agreement whereby the District would pay the City the City's actual cost to operate Fire Station No. 5 on an annual basis. If the City Counsel of Missouri City is interested in pursuing the options set forth in this letter, I would suggest the Council authorize the City Manager to enter into contract negotiations with the District's consultants to develop the documents necessary to memorialize these two proposals. If you have any questions regarding the District's proposal, please contact the District's attorney Richard Muller, Allen Boone Humphries Robinson LLP, at (713) 8606415 or myself at (713) 621-0050. The Board of the District looks forward to working with you to accomplish these two important projects for Sienna Plantation.

Sincerely, Carl S. Bowles, President

cc: Sienna Plantation Municipal Utility District No. l
Board of Directors: Robbie Bates, Vice President, Allen Robinson, Secretary Pamela Logsdon, Assistant Secretary James Feuerbach, Assistant Vice President

Michael Smith, Sienna Plantation Development Co. Jim Price, Regent Properties
posted by responsible_dvlpmnt at Saturday, September 03, 2005 | 48 comments

______________________________
Current comment: So the JDC appointed Master MUD#1 is picking up most of the costs and paying for them based on current and future Sienna residents to the tune of about 13.5 million dollars. Do other Mo-City neighborhoods and communities serviced by this fire station and/or treatment plant kick-in through the city??? What is the cities obligation in this anymore? Does this push them out of compliance with the developer's agreement with the city? Questions, questions...

5:38 AM


Anonymous said...
I wonder why it is so difficult to get one set of numbers out as pertaining to the SJD DA/City and the MCFS#5?

5:44 AM


Anonymous said...
FBISD school over-crowding article regarding Baines:

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nb/fortbend/news/4116404.html

3:28 AM


Comment Deleted
This post has been removed by the blog administrator.

3:33 AM


Anonymous said...
For JK and pals:

You might be a lawyer if:

You are charging someone for reading these jokes.

The shortest sentence you have ever written was more than eighty words long.

You have a daughter named Sue and a son named Bill.

Your other car is a BMW.

When you look in a mirror, you see a lawyer.

When your wife says "I love you," you cross-examine her.

4:55 AM


InternetImposter-Spartacus (you pick) said...
This just in from Mo-City:

Statement of Increase/Decrease

--If Missouri City adopts a 2006 tax rate equal to the effective tax rate of $0.485321 per
$100 of value, taxes would increase compared to 2005 taxes by $173,534.

________________
Comment: Once again another broken campaign promise by the mayor???

8:40 PM


Anonymous said...
Here's an interesting SLAPP-suit from Seabrook, TX:

Gag Me With A Suit

No Winners In
Seabrook SLAPP Suit

Seabrook voters ousted the mayor and three councilman in February. However, the ousted officials remained in office until the May election. No contracts were signed with the Port of Houston Authority and the ousted officials dropped their libel suit against the petitioners.

So how did the recall petitioners celebrate their victory? By paying $55,000 in legal fees.

Perhaps Abraham Lincoln said it best: “Discourage litigation. Persuade your neighbors to compromise whenever you can. Point out to them how the nominal winner is often a real loser in fees, expenses and waste of time.”

Incidentally, the petitioners dropped their counter-suit.

Exercising civil rights in Seabrook could land you in court.
Angered over the city’s negotiations in the proposed Bayport expansion, several Seabrook residents launched a recall petition seeking the removal of the mayor and three city councilman. The city officials countered by filing a lawsuit against the petitioners, claiming the recall petition was libelous.

The city officials claimed their names were maligned by the accusation that they may have a possible conflict of interest between their official duties and personal business affairs.



Reportedly, the petitioners have racked up $20,000 in legal fees defending themselves. City Secretary Michelle Glaser has also been named in the suit for certifying the petition and the accompanying signatures of more than 500 Seabrook voters.

The city officials claim Glaser never presented the certified petitions to the council and therefore the recall vote, scheduled for February 12, should not occur.

Mayor Robert Robinson dropped his lawsuit on December 30. The recall effort remains.

The petitioners are seeking reimbursement of their attorney fees.

4:53 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Doesn't Mr. Muller work for the same law firm (Allen, Humphries & Boone) that has represented the developers on land issues before Missouri City?

6:56 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"The station would serve not only future residences if Sienna Plantation's development continues south but also the general area surrounding the subdivision, according to Simpson."

-Then why isn't the city helping defray the costs on this FS if it will also be serving city area neighborhoods?

7:07 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Won't it also serve newly sold South Sienna and Sienna Point too?

8:14 AM  
Blogger responsible_dvlpmnt said...

"Some neighbors, including a group which calls itself the "Committee for Responsible Development," have been pushing for the new fire station that they believe is needed because of the subdivision's growing population.
Chris Calvin, a resident and a member of the committee, said the developer and the city have not taken their concerns seriously.

Said Simpson, "We're moving it forward — that's the whole idea. There's no reason why the city doesn't want it built."

The group, which failed in its bid to stop the city from approving a multifamily development plan in the subdivision, said the anticipated 2,700 apartments could further burden the existing fire station if a new station is not built.

The group has since been involved in a lawsuit with the developer over a dispute stemming from the apartment plan.

However, according to Simpson and Muller, the apartments, which are planned a short distance from Fire Station No. 4, are covered by that station.

"The proposed apartment complex has absolutely no bearing whatsoever on the timing of the construction of Fire Station No. 5," Muller said."


--Maybe Mr. Muller might want to go back and review the streaming minutes of the two Feb. '05 city council sessions when the city promised adequate police and fire protection in order to soften the blow to the community when Mayor Owen pushed this project through for his number 2 campaign contributor (yes Johnson Development Co, of Houston)....ck it out Rich!

8:23 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What about all the new commercial coming in and the 3 schools (2 newer ones) that need this protection?

9:28 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here's an inspiring quote:

Never forget that life can only be nobly inspired and rightly lived if you take it bravely and gallantly, as a splendid adventure in which you are setting out into an unknown country, to meet many a joy, to find many a comrade, to win and lose many a battle.
~ Annie Besant

1:28 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here's an interesting piece on the chief county judge at http://www.brazosriver.com/#aug31

2:17 PM  
Blogger responsible_dvlpmnt said...

--Some of you who do not have access to the resident funded developer run website (SiennaNet) may be interested in reviewing this piece e-mailed to Sienna residents on Aug. 31 (yesterday) when the chron article ran on this same issue. --Notice several contradictions again in this letter and the news report. Especially pay attention to the difference in home counts again (coming from the same sources) and the fact that both releases ignore the need for 4 fire fighters per truck in order for a crew to go into a burning home or building, otherwise they must request a second truck (thus the need for another firehouse as per the dev. agreement with Mo-City). It seems especially interesting that the Smith/developer release ignores the ISO (insurance ratings) and the money that would save homeowners each year.

Here it is:

The following is provided by Michael Smith, General Manager of Sienna/Johnson Development regarding Fire Station #5 in Sienna Plantation.


Frank Simpson, City Manager for the City of Missouri City spoke at the Sienna Developer Update on July 25, 2006 He addressed the building of Fire Station #5. Mr. Simpson stated that, the City is entering into a design contract on proposed Fire Station #5, to be located in the vicinity of Waters Lake Blvd and Sienna Parkway. The final site selection will be made during the design phase. The trigger point to start this design process is set at 3,000 units in the proposed service area (Sienna MUDs #2, 3, 4, 5 and 6). For clarification purposes, MUDs #2, 3, 4, 5 and 3 are located south of the secondary entry on Sienna Parkway (where the water fountain in located) and includes the Villages of Steep Bank, Waters Lake, Shipman’s Landing and Brushy Lake. The Villages of Bees Creek and Anderson Springs will remain in the Fire Station #4 service area even after station number 5 is constructed and are not included in the 3000 trigger calculation .

It can be confusing when residents hear that there are over 3,800 homes in Sienna. However, there are less than 3 000 in MUDs #2 and 3. At conception, this trigger point assumed uniform development in all of these districts. MUDs #2 and 3 are the only Districts with residential homes at this time and they are just now approaching the 3000 unit mark. Therefore, without development in the other MUDs #4, 5 and 6, which are located south of Sienna Johnson Development boundaries, the City needs to review the trigger point. There is concern at Missouri City, that the operating cost of the station could be disproportionate to the number of users in the service area without development in MUDs #4, 5, and 6.

The City is advancing the design process on the station at this time, but wants to review their operating cost projections and conduct Town Hall meetings with the residents of MUDs #2 and 3 to review the potential cost of service before they set a construction date. The cost to construct the fire station and for a fire truck is the responsibility of MUD #1 and they have the capital financing mechanism in place to transfer the funds to the City for construction of the facility . However, the cost to staff and maintain the facility must be borne by the MUD #2 and 3 residents. Missouri City’s initial estimate to run the station is approximately $1,000,000 annually. This cost will be divided among the 3000 current homes and reflected in their monthly water statement.

Currently, the owner of the land located in MUDs #4, 5 and 6 has no plans to develop housing in the near future. It is Sienna Johnson Development’s understanding that the MUD #2 and 3 residents will have input with the city as to whether they want to pay the additional cost to run the new station now, or rely on the current service from Fire Station #4 (located at Sienna Parkway and Trammel Fresno) until there are more users in the service area to distribute the operating cost load. The City plans to set dates for the Town Hall meetings in the fall, but have indicated that they will start the design process in accordance with the 3000 home trigger mechanism.

Since Sienna is not currently located in the City Limits of Missouri City, the community currently has an out-of -district fire protection agreement with City. Each resident pays just under $8 per month to receive first response service from the City. Until Sienna is annexed, Fire Station #5 and its service area would also be located outside of the City limits. Therefore, the users in the service area would bore the full cost of operating that station. After annexation, the cost of all stations located within the City limits would be spread over the City's entire tax base.

6:46 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"For clarification purposes, MUDs #2, 3, 4, 5 and 3 are located south of the secondary entry on Sienna Parkway (where the water fountain in located) and includes the Villages of Steep Bank, Waters Lake, Shipman’s Landing and Brushy Lake. The Villages of Bees Creek and Anderson Springs will remain in the Fire Station #4 service area even after station number 5 is constructed and are not included in the 3000 trigger calculation "


--Sounds like this release is ignoring the importance of having two trucks (with 3 riders each) in order to enter a burning home or building too...?

--It is nice to see how closely the city works with our developers, MUDs, etc.. though, right? . . ;-)

4:40 AM  
Blogger responsible_dvlpmnt said...

This FB Star story will give you less faith in our county boys:

Sheriff refuses to send sentenced driver to TDC
Daughter of victim protests special treatment;
asks what price keeps driver out of prison

By LeaAnne Klentzman

In January of 2003, a teen driver crossed the center lane of traffic on FM 1093/Westheimer Road near Harlem Road and killed Dawn Barton, 53, and in a three car pileup seriously injured Betty Growden, Barton’s passenger and 76-year-old mother.

In late 2003 Tarah Ashley Hamilton, who was 17 at the time of the accident, was indicted for intoxicated manslaughter for the death of Dawn Barton. Eventually the case made its way through the justice system, and she was convicted. She was sentenced to a 10-year probated sentence with conditions. Some of those conditions included 800 hours of community service, 180 days in jail, a $10,000 fine and participation in court ordered classes. Remaining drug and alcohol free during the course of probation was also a condition.

On May 10, 2006, 240th District Judge Thomas Culver revoked Tarah Ashley Hamilton’s probation in Sanctions Court after several violations. He sentenced her to six years in the Texas Department of Corrections. At that hearing, a letter from Sugar Land State Representative Charlie Howard was faxed to the Judge’s officer asking for leniency on behalf of Tarah Hamilton. Since that hearing in May, Tarah Hamilton has been returned to Fort Bend County jail and made a trustee. According to what the Sheriff said to Paula Craig, daughter of the deceased victim, Hamilton will not be sent to TDC to serve her sentence.

After over three years of frustration and hours of court appearances, Paula Craig, Dawn Barton’s daughter, came to the end of her patience. Last week she met with Sheriff Milton Wright and Chief Deputy Craig Brady and asked when Tarah Hamilton would be sent to prison and if not, why not. Their answer came as a real surprise said Ms. Craig.

The Sheriff and Chief Deputy Craig Brady told Ms. Craig that Tarah Hamilton held the position of trustee. Furthermore, trustees are needed to keep the jail running and clean. They said she was doing a good job so they saw no need to transfer her. Also during that meeting, attended by Craig and her employer, Wright and Brady acknowledged that they were friends with Tarah’s father, John H. Hamilton, and he was a political supporter.

Upset by their response, Paula Craig then met with Judge Culver and the District Attorney’s Office. Judge Culver sent a letter to Sheriff Wright outlining the concerns of both the District Court and the Sanctions Court run by retired Judge Reagan Clark.

During the time Ms. Hamilton was under the direction of the Sanctions Court, she apparently did not appear to take the special sanctions seriously, said Judge Culver. He said he was concerned about how the Sheriff’s actions could impact the effectiveness of the Sanctions Court. Simply put, failure to abide by court ordered sentences could undermine the effectiveness of the courts. However, Judge Culver said Sheriff Wright runs the jail. At the time of her revocation, Tarah Hamilton was sentenced to a six year prison term, although with good time and time served, she could spend far less time before becoming eligible for parole.

Later that week, the Star placed a call to Sheriff Milton Wright to inquire about Ms. Hamilton. He was unavailable so Chief Deputy Craig Brady responded. When asked why Ms. Hamilton had not been sent to TDC, he said that she was a trustee and was doing a job.

He went on to say that if she weren’t doing her trustee job, the taxpayers would have to pay someone to do it. When asked, he could not identify what that job was. After even more inquires, at press time Ms. Hamilton’s trustee job is still a mystery.

In her quest for justice, Paula Craig checked the campaign contributions of Tarah Hamilton’s father to local politicians. She found that since March 24, 2003 Tarah’s father John H. Hamilton of Fulshear has contributed $9,650 to Sheriff Milton Wright’s political campaign. In March, 2003 he donated $1,800; in October, 2003 he donated $2,500; in March, 2004 another $750; and in April, 2006, $4,800.

Ms. Craig also learned that Sugar Land State Representative Charlie Howard was the recipient of a $1,000 donation by Tarah’s father as well.

In a television interview, Chief Deputy Craig Brady told the Channel 2 reporter that this situation had been blown out of proportion. He acknowledged that Mr. Hamilton had money but said it was not a factor in his daughter’s situation. Ms. Craig believes the facts speak for themselves.

In an interview this Monday, Chief Deputy Craig Brady acknowledged to the Star that he and several of his detectives are employed as personal security for Tarah’s father. That “extra job” for $20 dollars an hour is organized and run by Fort Bend County Texas Ranger Jeff Cook.

Brady declined to provide details about the “security,” saying it could compromise their efforts. Brady also acknowledged that Tarah Hamilton was allowed meetings in the Sheriff’s administrative offices with family but said it was not a special privilege.

At press time, convicted Tarah Ashley Hamilton, 21, who was intoxicated when she drove a vehicle which resulted in the death of Dawn Barton and the permanent disability of Betty Growden, and who had failed to lived up to her probation agreement, is still a trustee at the Fort Bend County jail. Further information about this case and others will be available as soon as the Star is provided the information requested though the pending open records requests at the Sheriff’s Office.

Get the rest of the story at http://www.fortbendstar.com/083006/n_Sheriff%20refuses%20to%20send%20sentenced%20driver%20to%20TDC.htm

9:10 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

See recent SLAPP-sut coverage from http://hoanewsnetwork.com/civic/node/47 (HOA Watch.org).

--a national consumer friendly site which keeps an eye on HOA abuse.

7:24 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

POLLHOST POLL RESULTS:

POLLHOST POLL RESULTS:

 

Question: Do you trust Allen Owen, mayor of Missouri City, TX, to represent you rather than his Houston corporate backers?

 

Results:

 

3%  participating said yes  (n20)

 

91%  participating said no  (n573)

 

6%  participating responded not sure  (n39)

 

(N) sample =  632

 

Stay tuned as more surveys for coming elections are posted!

Web Statistics
Alienware Computers

This site covers the Missouri City, Texas and local vicinity. Copyright (c) c.calvin 2005-2010 ....you can contact the web-blog coordinator for MCC/CRD at responsible_dvlpmnt@yahoo.com