Friday, November 18, 2005

Sienna Plantation MUD #2 Ditch Update (from SPMUD2 website)-

Repost from SPMUD #2 website

We will update this as information becomes available:

Ditch Steering Committee Update
Mr. John Jakubik (on behalf of the Ditch Steering Committee) conveyed to the Board the Committee’s


recommendation regarding a solution and path forward for rectifying the standing-water problems being experienced in the ditchsections of Sienna MUD No. 2. The Committee recommended an alternative (Primary Collector Option) that will provide additional elevation drop and increase the slopes available to keep water moving through to the system’s multiple outfall points. As this is stated, the Board wants to be very clear that the drainage system as it exists today works quite well with regard to handling extremely large rainfall events and preventing flooding. The problems that exist within the system are limited to handling drainage issues at the other end of the spectrum - the elimination of standing water from the ditches.

After receiving the recommendation from Mr. Jakubik along with some engineering input from Mr. Tom Ramsey (with our third-party engineers - Klotz & Associates), the Board scheduled a special meeting for September 30, 2005. For the special meeting, Klotz & Associates were asked to perform the necessary work to take the conceptual alternative chosen by the Committee to a higher level of engineering detail so that budgetary and implementation issues could be more fully discussed. At the September 30 meeting, these issues were discussed and the Board approved a motion to authorize Klotz & Associates to proceed with detail engineering of the Primary Collector Option.

Contracts for Klotz to perform that work were requested to be presented for approval at the October 17th board meeting. Specifically, the Primary Collector Option includes the construction of a piped storm sewer system in the North-South corridors within Steep Bank West to provide for as much as 24 inches of additional elevation drop to the system’s various outfall points.

The piped storm sewer will result in shallow swales with area inlets (see example picture below) that will collect rainfall and channel it into the piped system.

By adding this additional elevation drop in the North-South corridors, the East-West drainage ditches (which flow into the North-South corridors) can be re-graded to benefit from this additional slope. There will also be some re-setting of culverts (under driveways) which were set improperly during initial construction. In these cases, the culverts were set with either a flat or a reverse slope that impeded the flow of water. With regard to the cul-de-sac areas in Steep Bank East and Steep Bank West, the Board is continuing to look at the options available to remedy those drainage problems and that are complimentary to the work described above.

In addition to the work above, the Board will also be working to address the situations where water stands in the culverts underneath driveways. This situation predominantly exists as a result of a design code requirement, from the City of Missouri City, that stipulated the minimum culvert diameter be not less than 24”. This size pipe required that many of the culverts through-out the ditch-sections be counter-sunk below the ditch’s designed flowline elevation. Had the bottom of the 24” culvert pipe been installed at the ditch’s designed flowline elevation, it would have resulted in driveways not being level with the streets. To the extent it does not impede the flow of water in an extreme rain event; the Board is planning to fill in these counter-sunk culverts to match the ditch’s flowline elevation.

This work is estimated to begin in March/April, 2006. The exact start date will be decided based on weather conditions closer to that time. There are several options with regard to how the work might be phased and the Board will continue to work through those options to come up with the most effective/efficient plan that has the least disruption to the community. In the interim, the Board will be going through the legally required public advertising process to prepare the bid documents, qualify the contractors and to accept bids for the work. This should enable the Board to evaluate the bids and execute contracts well before the planned start date mentioned above.

***The final aspect of the Ditch Steering Committee’s charter had to do with finding a third-party legal counsel that would evaluate the legal issues and determine whether or not there were any parties that could be held legally responsible for the situation as it exists. The Board has directed our third-party counsel, Bracewell & Guiliani, to undertake efforts to begin the process of pursuing appropriate remedies. In anticipation of possible legal proceedings, this is all that can be communicated at this time about this aspect of the project.***

12 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

2:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Did anyone notice you can't find the SPMUD2 link anynore on the new siennanet.com?

2:25 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wonder what those legal remedies may entail and whom they should be directed at?

3:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

3:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't see the cost list on the project. Can you all get that and post the approximate amount this will run us?

3:40 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Does anyone know how much debt is being floated in MUD 1?

5:47 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

7:02 AM  
Blogger responsible_dvlpmnt said...

All I know is they have the debt taken on for the sports park and the 13.5 million related to the second firestation and the sewage treatment facilities. This does not include the normal development issues like streets and drainage, etc...

Of course no roads currently exist in MUD 1 and that area was recently sold to a California development company. You can check for the rest of this through their developer appointed non-resident board members to get more (two of the current members are former Mo-city council members). By law they can't keep that data from you.

8:52 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sounds like those moving into the MUD 1 area are going to have some high taxes for some time.

4:18 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

4:58 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Does anyone have any information on whether or not the Southwest Houston Regional Airport (Arcola) is still trying to expand its runways for extended corporate jet service?

6:06 PM  
Blogger responsible_dvlpmnt said...

This was in the FB Star a few years ago (Bev's burner). Obviously, we hope, that Bev didn't realize that her friends out in Sienna, the developer, had our neighborhood on the fly way and that corporate jets would make our quality of life, as well as our property values (the thousands of homes here now) tank and that would hurt the MoCity economy too.
_____

"Okay, the airport .... I believe that Fort Bend County should buy the Arcola airport for several reasons which I will discuss although not necessarily in order of importance.

It's not going to cost the county any money. It will be paid for by funds from the federal government and while WE are the federal government, that money has already been taxed and collected and if Fort Bend County doesn't get it, then Dallas, or Memphis, or a myriad other cities or counties will.

The disparity between what the airport is valued on the tax rolls and what it will be sold for is due to the fact that the airport has a special use public exemption. It is not unlike the exemption that county clubs get for their golf courses or farmers for their four cows and a bull.

The homes in the area were built AFTER the establishment of an airport. The buy out of the few homes which will have to be moved will be generous and with relocation fees, most likely more than the homeowners can get with any kind of operating airport in the area.

The economic impact on Arcola, which needs it, will be wonderful for that improvised area, which currently has little tax base.

It will not affect the business at the Sugar Land Airport because the Arcola airport will draw from Hobby and places easily accessible to that part of town. The new toll road will make it doubly feasible to several parts of town that wouldn't come to Sugar Land anyway.

As more people and companies buy small planes to avoid the hassle at the larger airports, more commuter airports are needed. If Rosenberg wants an airport, they should start now getting their ducks in a row.

The owner of the Arcola airport is a second generation operator who has that airport in great shape for the a buyout. Rosenberg can do the same and by that time, we'll probably need another airport there.

As far as Sugar Land, I'm reminded of what I told my good friend Stafford Mayor Leonard Scarcella many years ago when he was muttering about the Economic Development Council locating businesses in places other than Stafford. "Leonard," I said, "You can't have it all." He looked at me with a shocked expression on his face (as if he had never thought about that before) and sheepishly replied, "I can try."

Fort Bend County has granted many dollars in tax abatements to help Sugar Land whose residents also pay Fort Bend County taxes. In other words, we're all in this together and a new county airport will be a great boon.


B. K. Carter is publisher of the Fort Bend Star. You can e-mail her at bkcstar@earthlink.net. "


--We will attempt to get more on the airport board and current plans as soon as we get a chance to speak with someone more involved. -Stay tuned!

7:55 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

POLLHOST POLL RESULTS:

POLLHOST POLL RESULTS:

 

Question: Do you trust Allen Owen, mayor of Missouri City, TX, to represent you rather than his Houston corporate backers?

 

Results:

 

3%  participating said yes  (n20)

 

91%  participating said no  (n573)

 

6%  participating responded not sure  (n39)

 

(N) sample =  632

 

Stay tuned as more surveys for coming elections are posted!

Web Statistics
Alienware Computers

This site covers the Missouri City, Texas and local vicinity. Copyright (c) c.calvin 2005-2010 ....you can contact the web-blog coordinator for MCC/CRD at responsible_dvlpmnt@yahoo.com