Tuesday, October 11, 2005

FBISD Board Vote Gives Baitland A Year's Paid Leave (Just in from FortBendNow.com)

FBISD Board Vote Gives Baitland A Year's Paid Leave
by Liz Mitton, Oct 10, 11:17 pm

The Fort Bend ISD Board of Trustees approved an amendment to Superintendent Betty Baitland’s contract Monday night that will allow her to step down from active duty at year-end 2005 and continue to collect her salary while on leave throughout 2006.

The vote capped a contentious and sometimes bitter exchange during the past two weeks between board members and those in the community who felt the move cut Baitland’s tenure short unnecessarily.

Baitland’s contract was renegotiated early in 2005, extending it to December 31, 2009, and providing for a raise in her base salary to $216,000 per year. In May of 2005, however, Baitland publicly announced her intentions to retire in late 2006.

Trustee Laurie Caldwell moved to reconsider last week’s decision on the amendment which was voted down in a 4-3 vote on Oct. 3rd. At that time, Caldwell stated that while she was in favor of the amendment, she felt some board members needed additional time to review and discuss it.

After convening in closed session for one and half hours, the Board reconvened and Caldwell made the formal motion to reconsider. The motion passed 4-3 with Trustees Caldwell, Lisa Rickert, Stan Magee and Ken Bryant in favor.

The contract amendments provide for:

→ A December 31, 2006, retirement date for Baitland;

→ Baitland to go on leave effective January 1, 2006, using her accrued state and local leave and vacation days, which would add up to a year;

→ During her leave, Baitland would not be required to perform her duties as superintendent. The board would appoint another person or persons to oversee those duties;

→ Baitland would provide advice and counsel as called for by the board and has the consent of the board to attend professional conferences during her leave.

→ Baitland would provide assistance and cooperate with the district regarding claims, complaints, lawsuits or other legal actions that may be brought against the district;

→ Baitland would be indemnified from any claims that may be brought against her if they relate to the term or scope of her employment with the district;

→ Both parties would agree to a mutual non-disparagement clause, which provides that neither Baitland nor the board (as a body or individually) will disparage the other or interfere with any contracts or business relationships.

The board also unanimously approved hiring Don McAdams, president of the Center for Reform of School Systems, to serve as a moderator during the Board’s self-evaluation scheduled for November 7, 2005.

48 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

4:08 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's good to see some resolution on this. Now the district can begin to look forward and regroup a bit. I wonder if the reform consultant has a stellar success record with this sort of thing?

4:09 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm sad to see her go. Wasn't she just named superintendent of the year?

6:48 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I know she was named a finalist as Super of the Year.
And they pushed her out.
Go figure.

2:03 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The old board nominated her before leaving office (a political move to make the new board look bad) and she stated before renewal that she was looking to retire soon. Most change in school boards on a reform ticket replace the superintendents.

3:06 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

5:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Maybe this will be an opportunity for the new board to move the district out of this political dead end game that has been going on since the elections.

4:02 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I've known Betty Baitland well for many years and have personal knowledge that she had no intention of retiring in the near future. Don't kid yourself, they're pushing her out and she's too much of a lady to "tell all".

7:23 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sounds like a done deal and she's getting a pretty good settlement out of it. It may be time to look ahead and move past this. It does no good to keep fighting the wrong people on this reform effort. The power structure goes well beyond the district and much of the negatives impacting this area has little to do with the petty internal politics going on at that level.

9:02 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

9:02 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"It does no good to keep fighting the wrong people..." That sounds like a threat!

I thought we lived in a free country, but maybe FBISD under it's new "management" is excluded.......

Baitland's demise was determined the minute the votes were counted in May. That was the #1 issue for the "new guard."

12:18 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Actually anytime in Texas a new board is elected often the supts. are replaced. Fairly standard politics in this part of the country. If you want it changed you best go to the legislature and make those positions elected ones as in some states. That would do much more to ope up the process but that's just MHO. Good luck!

2:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's TEXAS!!!!

4:10 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

4:04 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It is curious that this site will publish articles by Liz Mitton, an admitted advocate for the new board majority, rather than articles from "straight" news organizations like the Houston Chronicle or the Fort Bend Herald. Here is the latest Chronicle article on the subject.

Oct. 11, 2005, 10:33PM

Baitland to retire early from FBISD
Trustees amend contract with superintendent

Fort Bend Independent School District Superintendent Betty Baitland, 61, is retiring early after trustees amended her contract Monday night.

Baitland and the board reached an agreement about her retirement date and then trustees amended the contract.

Meanwhile, the Texas Education Agency is investigating allegations that certain board members may have acted without authority of the board and assumed duties assigned to district administration. The agency expects to release a preliminary report of its findings Nov. 19.

Baitland's contract originally ran through June 2009, but with the change, she will retire officially effective January 2007. She will begin her leave from the district in January, using accrued days. Baitland was appointed superintendent in July 2002 after serving several months as interim superintendent. She has worked with the district since 1977.

Baitland said, "I love this district and the children we teach, and I will miss what I do very much."

On behalf of board trustees, Board President Lisa Rickert said, "Dr. Baitland is respected and held in high esteem by many people in our community and has received many awards and accolades during her tenure."

Most recently, Baitland was selected as the 2005 Region IV Superintendent of the Year, and is one of five finalists for the 2005 Superintendent of the Year sponsored by the Texas Association of School Boards.

Rickert and Baitland said they are committed to working together during the coming months to provide for a smooth transition in leadership.

The board will appoint interim leadership beginning this January while the board conducts a search for a new superintendent.

HoustonChronicle.com -- http://www.HoustonChronicle.com | Section: Fort Bend Co. News
This article is: http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/thisweek/zone17/news/3392582

11:13 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"It is curious that this site will publish articles by Liz Mitton, an admitted advocate for the new board majority, rather than articles from "straight" news organizations like the Houston Chronicle or the Fort Bend Herald. Here is the latest Chronicle article on the subject."

I guess you haven't read all the other articles posted on this site from multiple news sources? I believe Mitton is a reporter for FortBendNow.com and contributes to the FB Sun so why should her news be banned from this site? Your's has been posted and not removed.--Do your homework before spinning your tripe here.

2:28 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Are you telling me that you believe Ms. Mitton is the most unbiased source you can find? She does seem to be your primary source on FBISD issues. Or did I miss something?

What did I say that would warrant removal? Is it improper to point out fact?

2:49 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You're right that poster was pretty harsh towards you. I wonder if they can remove your post or if they would have to appeal it to the blog administrator? Maybe you could file a complaint against them to the blog moderator. Don't you just love this site!

3:36 PM  
Blogger responsible_dvlpmnt said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

3:44 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think Liz is great. I'm so proud of the work she has done with the grassroots movement in Sugar Land. It really has upset the "establishment" types. Maybe something like it can happen here in Missouri City with all the favors going around between our mayor and developers.

5:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Everyone who hates Baitland loves Liz.

7:34 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's a pretty exteme view and rather simplistic if you don't mind me saying so.

6:41 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Many times the truth is very simple.

12:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The next superintendent will need to be one with a great deal of patience to deal with the obvious polar views on this subject and some of the political fallout too.

12:25 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Surely you jest. Who in their right mind will come to FBISD?

The next superintendent will be a patsy and someone with few other job opportunities. No one of quality will come here knowing that at any moment, a target can be painted on their back.

1:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Or someone of great character and inner strength. Of course there are those of you in the community that will doom them before they can even get seated. That's usual in districts feeling the stress this one is of urbanization brought by our Houston corporate buddies! Thanks guys.

2:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Someone of great character and inner strength to work for the gang of 4! Now that is rich!

4:17 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's my opinion that the reform now going on at the district level will benefit the kids ultimately and it may mean shaking up the administrative hierarchy a bit to accomplish that. I welcome this move and look forward to supporting it. If you can't help then get out of the way of those who want to.

7:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Finding the good in all this is how you change the lemons (if you feel that's what they are) into something more proactive. Community involvement in this process is being invited and we shouldn't bury our heads on this either.

8:22 AM  
Blogger responsible_dvlpmnt said...

This just in from the Chronicle:

New trustee says Baitland initiated own retirement; her supporters say she was forced out

By ERIC HANSON
Copyright 2005 Houston Chronicle
SUGAR LAND - Retiring Fort Bend Independent School District superintendent Betty Baitland was not forced out of her job by a power bloc of the school board, says board President Lisa Rickert.
Rickert said rumors that she and trustees Stan Magee, Laurie Caldwell and Ken Bryant wanted to get rid of Baitland are not true.
"We could not have taken this action had not she (Baitland) not initiated it," Rickert said.
But former school board member Jane Clarke and some Baitland supporters disagree.
"They think they run the school district," Clarke said. "They don't realize that is why you hire a superintendent — to manage the day-to-day activities of the school district."
At a school board meeting Monday, Rickert, Caldwell, Bryant and Magee voted to amend Baitland's contract to allow her to effectively retire. Trustees Bruce Bain, Cynthia Knox and Sue Hauenstein voted no.
Baitland, who earns about $210,000 a year, will retire officially in January 2007 but will be on leave beginning in January. Her contract originally called for her to work through January 2009.
The controversy swirling around school headquarters has also led to an investigation by a state agency regarding complaints made against some trustees. The complaints made by Clarke, and trustees Knox and Bain to the Texas Education Agency, allege that some board members have been meddling in daily school operations and going outside the chain of command.
Rickert said she and her supporters on the board are not interfering in school activities.
"We are not micromanaging. I think we are exercising our duties as board members to question and to ask for response and feedback and information from the superintendent," she said.
Rickert said she and other board members are working for efficient and effective government and want to see improvements in student academic performance.
Meanwhile, the board will begin searching for a new superintendent.
At the Monday meeting, Baitland said she wants to work with the board in the transition process and said the controversy surrounding the board's governance issues has negatively affected students and employees.
"I am committed to continuing to support the district and work with the board in an effort to resolve these issues," she said.

5:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Seems like a balanced report and very similar to the FortBendNow.com article posted earlier.

8:47 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It seems as if Baitland is working to have a healthy transition. She got a pretty good package it looks like too. I wonder if she will retire or seek another positon like the Florida attempt?

3:48 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Baitland is a class act. She has behaved with grace and poise in spite of the disrespectful and rude behavior by the new majority. I can't imagine who would come to work here after their antics.......

7:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here's some good news from the FB Sun:

"An anonymous Saudi Arabian donor has given $1 million to the Fort Bend ISD to cover the costs of providing education to hurricane victims.
Last week, FBISD Board President Lisa Rickert announced the donation during a workshop meeting. The donor is making similar donations to other school districts impacted by these recent disasters."

5:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

According to the report in the FB Sun now site investigation is warranted on the claims made by minority board members:

"Therefore, an on-site investigation of the complaint is not recommended at this time," TEA says."

5:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is an editorial from the Sun:

Editorial/Opinions
"Guest Commentary: What's really going on at Fort Bend ISD?

By JOHN HOPPE
10/17/2005



What is really going on with regards to the FBISD mess?
It would seem that some of the people and organizations in the middle of this mess have their own axes to grind.
Consider the two current trustees and the former trustee who wrote to the Texas Education Agency, for instance. But if those trustees (and a former trustee) have axes to grind, what about the TEA? Surely it can be counted on, can't it?
The TEA has a history of coming into a district when a superintendent is fired (or whose contract is "non-renewed") and performing a Section 39.075 investigation.
The Education Establishment in Texas - as in many other parts of the nation - is jealously protective of its power and control. Superintendents are part of the club. They are part of the establishment's own.
The establishment likes compliant, lap-dog boards. The establishment does not like independent school boards. Why? An independent school board, particularly in a county as prominent as Fort Bend, represents a risk. What if other school boards become independent? Why, horrors, the establishment could lose control!
Carol Jones, special projects director for Americans for Prosperity, an advocacy group interested in good school governance, made a telephone call to Ron Rowell within the TEA last week.
Rowell is the director of the School Governance Unit. That's part of the TEA that would conduct an investigation. Rowell told Jones that the TEA has no authority to involve itself in local school district matters that are personnel conflicts between superintendents and the school board.
Rowell did confirm that the TEA is gearing up for an investigation in Fort Bend as a result of written complaints received.
Jones asked Rowell what statutory authority they had to go in and investigate a school district.
Jones cited the Texas Educ-ation Code, Section 39.075. A Section 39.075 investigation (Special Accreditation Investi-gation) is a serious matter in which the District can be penalized with sanctions.
But it was interesting that Rowell, who did not seem to know who Jones is or he would surely not have been so candid, told Jones that he had been at TEA since 1997, that he knows Dr. Baitland, that she is a wonderful person and that she doesn't deserve any of what's going on in Fort Bend.
Also interesting was Rowell's revelation to Jones as to what it would take to get a TEA investigation started.
According to Rowell, the TEA goes in when written complaints are received alleging violations of Section 39.075 - like those sent by the two trustees and former trustee.
In an objective, fair world, such statements as those from Rowell, who heads up the part of the TEA that would be performing the "investigation," would be disqualifying. He clearly knows what's going on - he said so. He knows Baitland - he said so. And he has predetermined that Baitland does not deserve any of what's going on in Fort Bend - he said so.
When your writer first learned of the letters from the two trustees and former trustee, he wondered, "Did these three simply independently awaken this morning and over coffee become stricken with supernatural revelations urging letters to the TEA?" Obviously there was collusion and coordination.
The question now is who else was involved in this collusion, and for what purposes? And, did the pre-coordination extend as far as Austin?
The TEA has a history of going into districts that have fired superintendents or non-renewed their contracts and conducting Section 39.075 investigations. Sometimes the TEA prevails; sometimes it loses. When it prevails, there have been instances in which the TEA replaced elected school board members with "managers" chosen by the TEA. This seems to conflict with some provisions of Texas law but some districts that do not seem to know their rights and TEA's limits. There have been other districts that understood the limits and have successfully ignored TEA. Consider the school district in Nacogdoches that basically ignored TEA with no ill consequences.
So, the TEA has axes to grind. As a part of the Educational Establishment, TEA's interests would be served by giving an independent board its comeuppance and forcing it back into the fold of lap-dog boards.
And the person who heads the TEA's governance unit would get his payoff from punishing those he views as having caused problems for a colleague in the Establishment, that wonderful person who doesn't deserve any of what's going on in Fort Bend County.
This writer believes the most logical overriding reason is political. This writer believes the turmoil caused by the minority of the Board of Trustees, by the TEA and others will be used to try to influence the next several elections in order to attempt to return control of the board to what they view as the normal order of things - lapdog governance.
The question is: In light of all of this, what should the FBISD board do?
In light of the criminal investigations by the District Attorney and the apparent gearing up of the TEA for a Section 39.075 investigation, the board should not voluntarily turn over information over which the TEA may have no authority without first consulting independent counsel who owes allegiance only to the board.
The board should engage independent counsel and sever its relationship with David Feldman. One can serve only one master. Feldman may be a perfectly fine attorney but he cannot faithfully serve both the Board and the Administration (Superintendent) at the same time.
The board should learn about the interface between the TEA and the Nacogdoches ISD, in which that board, recognizing TEA's limits, successfully ignored the TEA and resolved its own issues as the Texas Education Code provides for and as the voters who elected that board expected.
The board should learn about the "First Amendment Lawsuit" that was filed as a part of the Nacogdoches ISD conflict. That lawsuit named TEA Com-missioner Shirley Neeley as defendant. The suit contended that the TEA uses the power of governance investigations to force school boards to toe the line and "play nice" with the superintendents. The ruling in that case ought to be useful to the FBISD board.
The board should conduct in-house training on the Texas Education Code with respect to what limited authority TEA has over the school board and the provisions of the law that reserve all else to the school board itself.
The board should review TASB policies. Most boards believe that they are bound by TASB's suggestions. Some of TASB rules are based in law; however, others are simply TASB generated with no basis in law. The school board does not have to adopt TASB's suggestions and most of TASB's policies appear to be designed to put muzzles on school boards. The school board, itself, should decide which of TASB's recommendations make sense for Fort Bend ISD and which are counterproductive. The board should then promptly modify Fort Bend rules accordingly. Finally, the FBISD board of trustees should continue to act independently, doing its job to the best of its ability, ignoring the TEA and the controversy."



(Hoppe is a local Republican Party activist.)

4:21 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Recent letter from SOS regarding the FBISD board president:

Friday, October 21, 2005
A letter from Board President Lisa Rickert to all FBISD constituents

SOS was forwarded the following letter from FBISD Board President Lisa Rickert today. In it, she lends her personal perspective on current controversies and sets the record straight regarding many rumors and misinformation circulating in the community.

10/20/05

Dear Friend:

I would like to start out by thanking those that have been providing me with overwhelming support, via email, voice mail and in person for my service on school board for FBISD. My apologies to those that I have not been able to respond to individually. Many of you have suggested I should update you on issues the Board is addressing and comment on some of the misinformation floating around. I’m sending you my personal thoughts and observations.

I apologize in advance for the length of this letter; however, I believe you deserve to hear the whole story. Please feel free to forward this to anyone in the District who has concerns or a similar interest.

First, the Board is working diligently to move the business of the district forward and involve the community in meaningful ways in solutions. We have re-established the following standing committees: Policy Review, Audit, Facilities and Planning, and Intergovernmental. More than 100 individuals volunteered to serve on the Policy Review Committee chaired by Stan Magee. A slate of community members will be presented for Board approval at the October 24th meeting so that the committee work can begin in earnest. I expect the other committees to begin their outreach and work soon as well.

In addition to working on greater accountability and fiscal responsibility, I am committed to leading the Board as we address academic challenges such as five schools which did not meet Adequate Yearly Progress this year and a continued narrowing of the achievement gap at all campuses. We must also find ways to direct greater resources for teacher training, more teachers to allow smaller classroom sizes, reduction of campus overcrowding, a reliable long-term facilities plan and proven ways to raise our lagging math and science scores district-wide.

The current Board is taking a more pro-active stance requiring greater accountability and information from our Staff. We are asking questions and not rubber stamping Staff recommendations as in the past. Whenever change occurs an adjustment period usually follows and at times certain parties find the adjustment period difficult. You have been hearing the adjustment taking place.

Furthermore, the current Board is seeking a more “open” Board with discussions and decisions made in public as required by State law. This change is also causing difficulty with certain parties. I believe the Taxpayers want the decisions to be made in open meetings as required by State law. (Click here to read more of the letter which address these issues:)

Internal Audits
Internal Auditor staffing and reporting structure
School construction delay and accusations of unnecessary cost overruns
TEA investigation
Putting Travel issues in perspective
Media Distortions
Dr. Baitland’s retirement. Where do we go from here?
I hope this information is helpful to you. In closing, I’d like to reiterate my personal commitment to working toward more open governance, greater accountability and high expectations for academic achievement in Fort Bend ISD. Those are the issues I was elected to address and remain those I am dedicated to pursuing.

Sincerely,

Lisa Rickert

9:32 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm glad you all posted this here.

5:48 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To read the full letter you can go to www.save-our-schools.blogspot.com or to www.fortbendnow.com

Some of the details about what has been happening and why are very revealing.

10:13 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

From FortBendNow.com:

"Fort Bend ISD Board President Speaks Out
by Liz Mitton, Oct 21, 03:28 pm

In a wide-ranging open letter to residents in Fort Bend Independent School District, Board President Lisa Rickert outlined issues facing the board, took aim at some of her critics and addressed what she characterized as “misinformation floating around.”

In her letter, dated Oct. 20, Rickert says a Texas Education Agency review of the district, sought by former and current board members, is an attempt to thwart more “open governance” in the district.
She also says the board acted to make the district’s internal audit director a direct board report, after a budget increase for the Internal Audit Department was denied by a district administrative department.
“In addition to working on greater accountability and fiscal responsibility, I am committed to leading the Board as we address academic challenges such as five schools which did not meet Adequate Yearly Progress this year and a continued narrowing of the achievement gap at all campuses,” Rickert said in the letter.
Rickert said in an interview Friday that she wrote the letter after receiving calls and emails from supporters urging her to do so. “Many people who know me and helped me to get elected suggested I address these issues directly.”

Rickert explained in the letter her view on why some in the community, including sitting members of the board of trustees, have been critical of her and other recently elected board members.

“The current board is taking a more pro-active stance requiring greater accountability and information from our staff,” her letter states. “We are asking questions and not rubber-stamping staff recommendations as in the past. Whenever change occurs an adjustment period usually follows and at times certain parties find the adjustment period difficult. You have been hearing the adjustment taking place.

“Furthermore, the current board is seeking a more ‘open’ board with discussions and decisions made in public as required by state law. This change is also causing difficulty with certain parties. I believe the taxpayers want the decisions to be made in open meetings as required by state law,” she said.
On Friday, Board Trustee Cynthia Knox, a sometimes-outspoken critic of recent board actions, said she had not yet seen the letter and declined to comment on it. Trustee Bruce Bain and Superintendent Betty Baitland did not return calls for comment late Friday afternoon.
Rickert’s letter discusses several matters that have caused controversy in the past few months, including:
Å® Several internal management audits conducted during the past three years, which she said “revealed inefficiencies and indicated where best practices were not being implemented. My concern, however, is that the potential for fraud and misappropriation of district assets has been long-term and substantial, and these audits are not being adequately and timely addressed.”
Rickert said the audits reflect primarily on business issues and “do not reflect the performance of our teachers in the classroom, nor their integrity.”

Å® Internal auditor staffing and reporting structure. The board majority recently approved beefing up the district’s internal audit staff and was criticized for doing so outside the normal budget process. Rickert, however, stated the move was necessary because “so many problems were being uncovered in the audits.”
She said the Internal Audit Department had requested a budget increase last spring, but “that request was denied by the head of a department that was subject to an audit at the time.

“This placed Internal Audit in a precarious situation that created various potential conflicts of interest,” Rickert’s letter states. “It caused the board to change the internal audit director’s job description and contract to clearly reflect that it reports functionally directly to the board and only administratively to the superintendent.”

Å® School construction delay and accusations of unnecessary cost overruns. In June the board delayed action on approving a construction contract for a new elementary school in the Waterside Estates area. The board has been accused of costing the district thousands of dollars due to this delay.

“There were many questions that board members felt they needed more time to get an answer for …. Without having the information we needed, we opted to table three proposed construction contracts totaling more than $60 million, ” said Rickert who also stated the amount of cost overruns, if any, have not yet been determined.

She also took the district administration to task saying, “I had observed many requests from the administration were habitually brought to the Board at the last minute seeking immediate approvals to meet impending deadlines. I found this unacceptable.”

Å® TEA investigation. Several weeks ago, a former board member and 2 senior board members asked for a Texas Education Agency review of Fort Bend ISD governance issues.

“In my view, their actions are an attempt to thwart the efforts of board majority to bring more open governance, greater oversight and more accountability to solving problems in the district,” Rickert said, calling the complaints “very vague with no detail supporting the accusations.”

Rickert indicated the TEA has stated “the District is not subject to any Agency program-monitoring interventions at this time. Therefore, an on-site investigation of the complaint is not recommended.”
“The complaint is being handled as a paper audit,” Rickert said, while maintaining questions are being raised about what TEA’s jurisdiction is and what legal authority the TEA actually has and what authority it is simply asserting.

Rickert said, however, she welcomes the TEA review and that she suspects, “that over the past 10+ years there may be many areas related to board actions that would be of great interest to the TEA or more likely the Fort Bend District Attorney and/or the Texas Attorney General. As the TEA continues its review, I will also be prepared to bring these matters to their attention.”
Å® Superintendent Baitland’s retirement and the future of that office.

The board approved amendments to Baitland’s contract on Oct. 10, which call for her to go on leave beginning January 1, 2006, and officially retire on December 31, 2006.

“On October 24th, the Board will discuss the process to appoint a temporary superintendent and how we will approach the upcoming search for a new superintendent to lead Fort Bend ISD,” said Rickert. “It is my hope that that process will help in uniting the board so that we can refocus our efforts on addressing the many challenges and issues facing us.”

6:08 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I haven't seen this anywhere. What are your sources for this news?

5:59 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It looks like, to me, they re using local media sources.

3:45 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ck out the latest on the audit on the SOS site.

7:58 PM  
Blogger raybanoutlet001 said...

coach outlet
oklahoma city thunder jerseys
rolex replica watches
coach bags
ugg outlet
nike store
coach outlet store
cheap oakley sunglasses
michael kors outlet
michael kors outlet online
2017.7.26

1:02 AM  
Blogger jeje said...

yeezy sneakers
adidas yeezy boost
nike lebron 14
adidas ultra boost 3.0
tom ford glasses
curry 4
adidas yeezy boost
adidas neo online shop
michael kors outlet
cheap jordans

8:46 PM  
Blogger AB78 said...

qzz0714
cheap jordans
polo ralph lauren
louboutin pas cher
oakley sunglasses wholesale
ray ban sunglasses
light up shoes
cheap nhl jerseys
kobe 9
simulation shoes
nike store uk

7:06 PM  
Blogger 5689 said...

zzzzz2018.10.11
ferragamo shoes
true religion jeans
ugg outlet boots
giuseppe zanotti
fitflops clearance
adidas shoes
ferragamo belt
fitflops clearance
nike blazers
michael kors outlet

6:36 PM  
Blogger yanmaneee said...

nike cortez
nike cortez men
louboutin shoes
jordan shoes
fila shoes
longchamp
off white nike
coach outlet
bape hoodie
goyard

12:15 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

POLLHOST POLL RESULTS:

POLLHOST POLL RESULTS:

 

Question: Do you trust Allen Owen, mayor of Missouri City, TX, to represent you rather than his Houston corporate backers?

 

Results:

 

3%  participating said yes  (n20)

 

91%  participating said no  (n573)

 

6%  participating responded not sure  (n39)

 

(N) sample =  632

 

Stay tuned as more surveys for coming elections are posted!

Web Statistics
Alienware Computers

This site covers the Missouri City, Texas and local vicinity. Copyright (c) c.calvin 2005-2010 ....you can contact the web-blog coordinator for MCC/CRD at responsible_dvlpmnt@yahoo.com