For More On Property Rights Efforts That Effect All Of Us--click here--

Also see:

http://www.ahrc.se/new/index.php/src/news/sub/report

http://pages.prodigy.net/hoadata/

FBISD News--click here--

Interesting facebook release of local school board member...click the title link above.

-LOWV Offers Report On The Texas Projection Measure-

UPDATE ON TEXAS EDUCATION (LOWV Houston Area Education Fund)

ACCOUNTABILITY: TEXAS PROJECTION MEASURE

TPM: The TPM is part of the accountability system that awards schools credit for students who have actually failed state-mandated tests, but who are expected to pass sometime in the future. Texas state Rep. Scott Hochberg, a Houston area representative and chairman of an appropriations subcommittee overseeing the education budget, was quoted by the American-Statesman as calling the measure “invalid,” and urged education officials to “start from scratch and develop a real measure of the progress students make in schools.” According to the State-Telegram, “when a student fails a test but shows enough gain to make it statistically likely that he or she is on track to pass during the next high-stakes testing period,” the TPM“ counts that student as having passed for school accountability purposes.”2 A Press Release by the HISD dated July 30, 2010, shows new data using the TPM and re-rating schools without the TPM. Data of 2008 reflects 38 Exemplary and 119 Recognized schools. Data for 2009 with TPM shows 84 Exemplary and 121 Recognized schools, while removing TPM leaves only 54 Exemplary and 111 Recognized schools. The difference shown in 2010 data reflects that with TPM, there are 101 Exemplary and 105 Recognized schools. Without TPM, there are only 56 Exemplary and 113 Recognized schools. HISD stated that even without TPM, HISD reflected growth by the number of highly rated schools increasing from 165 Exemplary and Recognized schools in 2009, to 169 in 2010.

This statistical device has magically turned about 450,000 of about 1 million failed TAKS tests last year into “passing” on the basis that the students were likely to pass two or three years later. The number of schools rated as “unacceptable” was more than cut in half, and the number given the top rating of “exemplary” more than doubled. Note: the student didn’t get credit for passing, but their school is shown to be doing a great job. Hochberg has shown that the Texas Projection Measure isn’t a “growth measure” at all, but has a miserable success rate at predicting success...

The statewide 2010 ratings recently released were fantastic, albeit, not credible. Of the 239 school districts that claimed the exemplary rating, only 72 met the standards without administrative help. Use of the TPM more than doubled the number of campuses classified as exemplary. The total went from 1,159 to 2,624 with the added boost. The same was true among the districts and campuses claiming Recognized and Academically Acceptable status. This measurement device is not fair to the children whose school districts and campuses have received a higher rating due to the creative bookkeeping. Students who are not passing the state’s accountability measures are not going to be equipped for college or the workforce. Accountability ratings need to mean something.

The TPM was introduced in 2009. It predicts students’ future TAKS scores in a given subject based ontheir current TAKS scores and on their previous year’s average campus score. If a student fails this year’s TAKS test but is predicted to pass in a future year, the school gets credit as if the student had passed thisyear. Because of the criticism, Commissioner Scott has said the TPM may be eliminated or revised in 2011. Supporters say the concept helps recognize the efforts of schools where students have made academic gains but still fall short of the passing standards.

Commissioner Scott sent a message to school leaders that he is considering doing away with the Texas Projection Measure or changing it for the 2011 accountability ratings. Some educators like the provision because it gives schools credit for how well students are expected to do in the future, while critics contend that it doesn’t give a true assessment of how students are performing.

Poor Treatment Of Employees Causes Split Vote At FBISD BOT!

See: http://www.ultimatefortbend.com/2010/08/district-bus-drivers-dont-get-paid-sick-leave

JUST FOR KICKS--click here--

Enjoy the break...

BOT Votes To Uphold "Truth In Grading" Court Ruling (Some not happy about it)

See this link for more:

http://www.ultimatefortbend.com/2010/08/minimum-policy-halts-practice-may-not#comment-8415

MCC comment: How much did the district legal vendor and consultants make off this legal challenge to common sense?

FBN: HOAs Growing Power Leaves Homeowners/Members Behind--see the FCCA story-- (Whats next in these property rights battles?)

FBN: Home Owner Associations Growing In Power While With Little Oversight Or Transparency
Wed, Aug 4, 2010

By, Nancy Hentschel

Home Owner Association (HOA) and Property Owner Association (POA) living is advertised to promote sales and to manage the homeowner population, but these “corporations” are specifically designed to disenfranchise most if not all the homeowners in the subdivision.

The HOA corporation is frequently controlled by the developers, builders, or even the vendors of the HOA corporation, such as the HOA management company and HOA attorneys. These entities seek legislation to give the HOA board (and therefore its agents) ever more control over the property belonging to the homeowners.

This latter group has formed their own trade organization (Community Associations Institute), which not only lobbies for anti-homeowner laws but also uses funds from HOA corporation coffers (their “client”) in order to pay for the lobbying expenses. One should note that these HOA funds were taken from the homeowners under threat of foreclosure (from assessments). The foreclosure power is used primarily to benefit these vendors, not the homeowners of the HOA...(get the full story by following the title link above)

Other: http://myfortbend.net/news/local/politics/1334-fbn-home-owner-associations-growing-in-power-while-with-little-oversight-or-transparency

Related: http://archive.kpft.org/mp3/100803_090001oj.MP3 (KPFT FM 90 Open Journal Show 29:45 Topic: HOA reform)

Chron: Motion To Over-turn Filed With The TCEQ Over The Blue Ridge Landfill Expansion Permit Near Missouri City & Fresno-

FBN Update 8-3-10: http://www.fortbendnow.com/2010/08/03/47124

Fort Bend Sun Update 8-3-10: http://www.hcnonline.com/articles/2010/08/03/fort_bend_sun/news/sws_-_landfill_83.txt

Group wants reversal of state permit on landfill
August 2, 2010 3:25 pm

Zen T.C. Zheng,

Despite an agreement reached between a landfill operator and leaders of a resident coalition opposed to that landfill’s expansion in east Fort Bend County, a group of coalition members aren’t giving up the fight yet.

Some of them have filed motions to overturn the state approval of a new permit for the continued operation and expansion of Blue Ridge Landfill.

Lisa Wheeler, a spokeswoman for the Texas Commission for Environmental Quality, said opponents have until the end of Wednesday to submit their requests for the commission to review the approval by Mark Vickery, the commission’s executive director...(follow the link above for the full piece)

Very Interesting Video: http://swamplot.com/garbage-playground-developing-houstons-blue-ridge-mountain/2009-05-12/

FBN: FBISD Remains "Academically Acceptable" According To Latest TEA Measures

See: http://www.fortbendnow.com/2010/08/02/47108

Post note: According to the FBISD release from 1:30p. this afternoon the district scores improved by over 15% from last years and apparently without the use of the Texas Projection Measure (TPM) or at least the FBISD release says so...

Fact ck-Well we called two separate contacts at the TEA and asked for confirmation that FBISD did in fact NOT use the controversial TPM but both sources claimed they did and referred us to these links to verify that they DID IN FACT USE THE TPM:

http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2010/static/tables/d079907.pdf

http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2010/static/summary/d079907.html

***What is the controversy surrounding the TPM? See:

http://www.statesman.com/news/local/state-may-eliminate-use-of-student-testing-projection-794907.html